Why didn't standard vulnerability scanners catch the MOVEit issue?

Many organizations were scanning, but static vulnerability detection doesn't always identify whether a flaw is actually exploitable or leads to critical business impact. The MOVEit vulnerability needed to be tested in context—confirming whether injection actually bypassed authentication and enabled data access. Automated pentesting platforms that chain findings together catch these realistic attack paths that isolated vulnerabilities miss.

How does AI-powered pentesting differ from manual pentesting?

Manual pentesting is thorough but slow and expensive—typically quarterly. AI-driven platforms run continuously, test exploitation chains automatically using learned patterns from millions of CVEs, and scale across complex infrastructure. They catch misconfigurations the moment they appear and understand which vulnerabilities matter most for actual exploitation.

What should we scan for to prevent MOVEit-like breaches?

Focus on OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities—especially SQL injection, authentication bypass, and broken access control. The key is testing whether these flaws chain together into real attack paths. Look for platforms that test across your full stack: web applications, APIs, cloud infrastructure, and integrated services. Continuous scanning beats periodic reviews when threats move this fast.

Automated Pentesting Could Have Stopped the MOVEit Breach

The MOVEit Failure: A Preventable Disaster

In May 2023, attackers began exploiting CVE-2023-34362, a critical SQL injection vulnerability in Progress Software's MOVEit Transfer platform. Within weeks, threat actors had breached hundreds of organizations—banks, healthcare systems, government agencies. The kicker? The vulnerability was disclosed and patches were available before the attacks even started. Organizations simply didn't know they were vulnerable.

This wasn't a zero-day scenario or an unknown threat actor using undiscovered exploits. This was a textbook case of poor visibility and slower-than-necessary remediation. And frankly, it's the kind of breach that modern automated penetration testing platforms should catch immediately.

Understanding the Attack Chain

Here's what made MOVEit so dangerous: the vulnerability isn't just a simple injection flaw. CVE-2023-34362 allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute SQL queries through the MOVEit Transfer web interface. But the real nightmare came from how attackers chained this finding with lateral movement techniques. Once inside, they could extract credentials, pivot to backup systems, and exfiltrate data from integrated applications—all because the initial SQL injection went undetected.

The vulnerability existed in the application's file transfer tracking functionality. An attacker could craft a malicious request, bypass authentication checks, and execute arbitrary database commands. From there, privilege escalation was trivial. Organizations that weren't continuously scanning their MOVEit instances—looking specifically for this class of OWASP Top 10 vulnerability—had no idea they were compromised until attackers went dark with their data.

How Continuous Automated Testing Changes the Math

This is where automated AI-driven penetration testing fundamentally changes the game. Platforms that combine vulnerability scanning with sophisticated exploitation chaining can identify not just individual flaws, but realistic attack paths that actually matter to your business. The difference is crucial: a basic scanner might flag SQL injection as a potential issue. An advanced automated pentest agent would test whether that injection actually leads to authentication bypass, data exfiltration, and lateral movement—exactly what happened with MOVEit.

These platforms analyze millions of known vulnerabilities and exploit databases to understand how attackers actually weaponize flaws. They're trained on real CVE data and understand the difference between theoretical vulnerabilities and exploitable ones. They also scale. While manual pentesting happens quarterly or annually, automated testing runs continuously, catching new misconfigurations the moment they appear.

Real Prevention for Real Risk

Think about the timeline differently: if a financial services firm had been running automated pentests covering SQL injection, SSRF, and authentication bypass attempts across their MOVEit infrastructure, the system would've flagged the vulnerability within hours of deployment. The test would've shown the exploitation chain—from initial injection to data access—with proof-of-concept payloads and actionable remediation steps. Patch urgency becomes obvious when you see the actual attack path, not just a CVE number.

Organizations like yours need visibility that matches the speed of threats. Quarterly manual reviews can't compete with attackers who weaponize disclosed vulnerabilities in days. This is why teams are increasingly turning to platforms that combine AI-powered exploitation chains with continuous scanning. These tools use residential IP rotation to test realistically, cover full attack surfaces—including cloud infrastructure and modern stacks—and actually tell you what matters.

What Should You Do Now?

If you're managing infrastructure, the lesson here is uncomfortable but clear: visibility gaps kill organizations. You need automated testing that catches exploitation chains, not just individual vulnerabilities. Start by understanding where your actual exposure lives—run a comprehensive scan across your applications and infrastructure. Tools that let you test continuously and report on real-world attack paths will save you from being the next MOVEit story.

The MOVEit Breach: Why Automated Pentesting Should Be Non-Negotiable